We are going to use this Blog to announce any changes to our website - new articles, design changes and anything else of interest, as well as point to websites we find usefull
Re. your commment that "Brigadier General Charles FitzClarence, VC, was one of the few senior British officers to be killed in action during the First World War." Few? In fact, 53 British Brigadier Generals were killed in action during the First World War.
I have a figure of 56 myself, out of a total of 1,253 British Generals of the Western Front, so around 4% were killed, compared to an average in the army of 10%.
This compared to 1,008 General of the American Civil War, of whom 150 or so were killed in action, or 15%. For good reasons First WOrld War generals tended to spend their time further back from the front that in earlier wars, thus suffering proportionally fewer casualties. Relatively few might be a more accurate phrase I suppose
2 comments:
Re. your commment that "Brigadier General Charles FitzClarence, VC, was one of the few senior British officers to be killed in action during the First World War."
Few? In fact, 53 British Brigadier Generals were killed in action during
the First World War.
I have a figure of 56 myself, out of a total of 1,253 British Generals of the Western Front, so around 4% were killed, compared to an average in the army of 10%.
This compared to 1,008 General of the American Civil War, of whom 150 or so were killed in action, or 15%. For good reasons First WOrld War generals tended to spend their time further back from the front that in earlier wars, thus suffering proportionally fewer casualties. Relatively few might be a more accurate phrase I suppose
Post a Comment